Friday, June 24, 2011
20 Shortcuts on Organizational Change Management
Friday, January 14, 2011
What's Missing in Organizational Change Theory and/or Practice?
"To me, the missing piece is 'completing the change' by effectively 'completing the transition' from the old state to the new state. In my opinion, most of the focus is on 'making the change happen', and once that's done little attention is placed on the transition (pain, feelings of loss, emotional support, fear, etc,) to ensure long term success of the change. This is frequently the case with IT-enabled change!
Not completing the transition usually results in significant/long-term dips in post change productivity, poor morale and can undermine the entire change effort. In many cases the cultural changes never happen as a result of this short-sightedness.
So, more attention needs to be placed on change transition vs. change management... William Bridges authored Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change almost 20 years ago. It's a great book, but often ignored. This finishing touch to the change process needs to become a key, recognized component of the practice of change management."
Cheers and warm regards,
Jim
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Here are Two Excellent Change Management YouTube Videos
- Cisco - Change Management Training Video - this is an excellent video for showing change impacts and how individuals successfully adjust. Perfect for Change Champions and Sponsors to view early in the planning process. Great for targets of a change to view to see a successful outcome. http://bit.ly/PpUeA
- Luc Galoppin - What is Organizational Change Management? This is an excellent overview of the major components of a change management project. The perfect elevator speech! http://bit.ly/bUMtSq
Enjoy!
Friday, June 11, 2010
Why Use the Term "Change Management"?
I have balked at using the expression "change management" for many years. It just didn't seem right. How can you really manage change? You lead it. You facilitate it. You embrace it. You pray for it. You avoid it. You dutifully accept it. You really can't manage it… right? So, after considerable thought, I decided to post the following provocative question on my favorite LinkedIn change management discussion boards:
"What is the best term is to replace "change management"? Many practitioners agree that this is a poor choice of words to describe the process. What is your vote? Why?"
Brave post, eh?
There were over 300 responses to this question. Here is a sampling of some of the proposed replacement terms:
- Change Preparedness
- Leading Change
- Change Enablement
- Building Capability and Capacity
- People and Organizational Transitions
- Business Transition Management
- Business Change Management
- Business Operations Enablement
- It's really just Leadership, isn't it?
- Organizational Change Management
- Managing Transitions
- Organizational Development
- Visioneering
- Organizational Transformation
- Organizational Effectiveness
- Organizational Behavioral Change
- Business Readiness
- Transformation Management
- Managing Change
- Nexting
- Facilitating "organizational lifestyle" change
- Business Transformation Enablement Program
- Resistance Management
- How about "A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down", or maybe Transition Management?
- Metamorphosis Management
- Making Things Happen
- Change Facilitation
- Human Transition Acceptance Management
- Change Acceptance
- Sustainable Change Implementation
- Next Level
- Transformation Process Management
- And the list goes on… many more…
There were also many postings by those who supported keeping "change management" as the cornerstone phrase:
- "It's the most commonly and universally accepted term."
- "Why change it - what purpose will it serve?"
- "Changing it will only cause more confusion!"
- "If it isn't broken, don't fix it!"
After evaluating the diverse (and often confusing) alternatives, I have decided to change my long-standing dislike for the term "change management". That's right… I'm changing! I am now using change management to describe my change consulting offerings.
As one of the respondents stated: "Change Management, like Rock 'n' Roll, is here to stay!"
Why fight it? Just do it well!
Cheers and warm regards,
Jim Markowsky
To learn more about X-Factor Solutions, visit our web site at http://www.x-factor-solutions.com/.
Monday, January 4, 2010
What process is at the leading edge of learning organizations?
- Solve complex problems and burning issues
- Launch organizational change initiatives
- Respond to challenging and changing customer needs
- Adjust to dynamic market and economic conditions
- Become better at what they do
- Explore possibilities
- Design or redesign business processes
Open Space Events:
There are generally three time structures for Open Space events:
1-day – results in a dynamic idea exchange and summary
2-days – results in a dynamic idea exchange, summary of ideas and specific recommendations
3-days – results in a dynamic idea exchange, summary of ideas, specific recommendations and the prioritization of action plans
How Open Space Events Work:
Most Open Space events are predefined by a Single Question that will be discussed during a 1 to 3-day meeting. The question has to be selected and crafted carefully by the management team, and supported by the Open Space facilitator. It should address a burning or conflicting issue that will ensure diversity of opinions and passionate engagement of the participants. Participants then create Focus Topics to discuss the Single Question and they are placed on a Topic Wall and scheduled for discussion. Participants can then attend any of the discussions they would like to participate in, and they can come and go as they wish.
One Law and Four Basic Principles:
Open Space utilizes a very simplistic self-organizing process that allows an organization to move quickly and involve a diverse group of players from any level or function of the organization. It does this by using One Law and Four Basic Principles:
One Law:
The "Law of Two Feet" is about one foot of passion and one foot of responsibility. If a participant is not contributing or enjoying a Focus Topic discussion where they’re at, they move on to another group where they will have the passion to participate.
Four Basic Principles:
1. Whoever comes are the right people. Only those who are present can contribute. Although the invitation list might limit the number of participants, an Open Space conference is open for anyone invited that is interested in the subject.
2. Whatever happens is the only thing that could have happened. All we have to deal with is what is.
3. Whenever it starts is the right time. Follow the energy flow… when it starts it starts… just go with it. Things get started when the creative energy starts to flow.
4. When it’s over, it’s over. Although time and place are predefined in an Open Space event, clocks play a very minor role in setting the pace. The participants decide how much time is needed to work on a subject – ten minutes, thirty minutes, two hours, one day – or not at all.
In Summary:
Although Open Space Technology was developed over 20 years ago, it is still a leading edge technology for engaging employees and bringing about self-organized and innovative results in a very compressed timeframe. For more information or development and facilitation of an Open Space workshop, contact Jim Markowsky at 740.804.1354 or jcm@x-factor-solutions.com.
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
A Guide to Leading a Self-Organizing Change Process
1. Get strong support (license) from a key leader (COO, CEO, VP... ).
2. Pull together a cross-functional team of volunteers that want to make a difference.
3. Perform a current state assessment with this team.
4. Create a vision with this team.
5. Perform a gap analysis with this team.
6. Agree on key action steps to achieve the desired state with this team.
7. Launch time-bound projects for each key action step, with a person responsible to achieve the desired result.
8. Celebrate milestone (action step) successes.
9. Stay the course - have a senior executive sponsoring the overall program (supporting, not managing).
10. Ensure a senior executive is giving recognition, providing encouragement and communicating successes.
This 10-step process works!
Copyright (C), Jim Markowsky
Copy and/or distribute with permission with credit to Jim Markowsky, X-Factor Solutions
Visit our web site at: http://www.x-factor-solutions.com
Monday, November 10, 2008
Survey Results: What are the Major Elements of a Successful Global ERP Business Process Transformation?
- Strong executive support 6.94 / 10
- Successfully managed the transition and change 6.32 / 10
- Effective communications and training 6.12 / 10
- Allocated adequate resources to successfully manage the change 5.68 / 10
- Significantly streamlined policies and procedures 5.38 / 10
- Global representation in the entire process 5.29 / 10
- Conducted a detailed global change impact assessment 5.00 / 10
- Let go of old ways and processes 4.88 / 10
- Became more strategic through creative use of the ERP system 4.79 / 10
- Identified industry best practices and set top-tier goals 4.59 / 10
- High level of involvement of partners (software, consulting, stakeholders)
- If the successful global business process transformation follows the outline below, all other ranking of priorities will fall into place. The organizational change management, data, aligned best practice processes, and measurement criteria eliminated the constraints of an unsuccessfully delivered solution.
1) Organizational Change Management
2) Data
3) Best practices
4) Key performance indicators to measure success - We made sure that our measurement & reward systems were in alignment with the newly desired results.
- Mentoring and use of SME within the organization
- Attainable goals, established process for identifying and resolving risks/issues, and strong project management
- Local change impact assesment
- Super Users as ambassadors
- Live or die strategic approach to the global process implementation
- Ensuring transformation solutions are implementable and sustainable
- Strong cascading managerial support, having change agents strategically placed and prepared, having two way communication vehicles, a reinforcement strategy to ensure desired behaviors are multiplied, and getting employees at all levels help to design the change details.
- Produced value for impacted employees: "easier to do my job," "can do things that I could not do before."
- Won support at ALL key levels:- Executive- Middle management/functional leaders- Front-line workers/supervisors
- The overall Strategic alignment and clarity of objectives why a ERP based transformation is required in the first place.
- We also assigned sponsors to ensure that each of the industry best practices and top-tier goals was given an appropriate level of focus before, during and after the implementation.
Prepared very good plan of whole transition. All major risks were identified, analyzed and mitigated. - Leadership, communications, training, and transition are the key elements. The other items you have listed are from a business perspective. The question is...are you looking at it from a people transition to the system or the business (ROI) perspective. I look at it from the people transitioning. Ideally...you should achieve both, but two very differert focuses.
- Involve mid-managers
- Addressed employee organizational readiness thru development of action plans
- Got the business heavily involved early on.
- Strong dislike of the current system.
- Phase the implementation, don't try to do too much at once, don't under estimate people's need to understand the new way.
- Get benefit from all of the data and analytics.
- Simple clear messages, mantained constancy of purpose, rewarded the right behaviours
- Celebrated the successes.
- Created early wins and communicated success.
Survey Elements: A group of 12 Global Change Agents developed the survey elments.
The survey was posted on the following eight Discussion Boards: Organizational Change Network, Network of Organizational Change Managers, Innovative Leadership & Change Management Expert Innovators Network, Change Agents, SAP/ERP Training & Change Practitioners, Organizational Change Practitioners, Organization Development Network, Change Consulting
Survey close date: November 9, 2008
Conducted by: Jim Markowsky, President, X-Factor Solutions
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Survey Results: What are the Top 10 Characteristics of an Organizational Change Agent?
1. Skilled Communicator 7.13 / 10
2. Emotionally Intelligent 6.45 / 10
3. Strong Leader 5.92 / 10
4. Excellent Problem Solver 5.81 / 10
5. Persuasive 5.41 / 10
6. Courageous 5.22 / 10
7. Strong Analytical Skills 5.04 / 10
8. Effective Educator 5.03 / 10
9. Flexible 4.79 / 10
10. Accomplished Project Manager 4.23 / 10
♦ Survey Participants: There were 159 global participants in the survey
♦ The survey was posted on the following Discussion Boards: Organizational Change Network, Network of Organizational Change Managers, Innovative Leadership & Change Management Expert Innovators Network, Change Agents, SAP/ERP Training & Change Practitioners, Organizational Change Practitioners, Organization Development Network, Change Consulting
♦ Survey close date: October 30, 2008
♦ Survey conducted by: Jim Markowsky, X-Factor Solutions
♦ Visit our web site at: http://www.x-factor-solutions.com
Friday, September 5, 2008
Organizational Change Network - Favorite OCM Books
1. The Heart of Change – John Kotter & Dan Cohen
2. Organizational Transitions: Managing Complex Change - Beckhard & Harris
3. The Dance of Change: The Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations – Peter Senge et al
4. Leadership on the Line - Ron Heifetz & Marvin Minsky
5. Discontinuous Change - David Nadler, Robert Shaw, & Elise Walton
6. Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership - Bill Torbert & Associates
7. Five Frogs on a Log - Feldman & Spratt
8. Making Sense of Change Management - Cameron & Green
9. Change Management - Hiatt & Creasey
10. Changing Gears - The Strategic Implementation of Technology - James Carlopio
11. The Fifth Discipline – Peter Senge
12. The Empty Raincoat: Making Sense of the Future – Charles Handy
13. Sex, Leadership and Rock'n'Roll - Peter Cook
14. Managing at the Speed of Change - Daryl Conner
15. Beyond the Wall of Resistance - Rick Maurer
16. Re-engineering – Hammer & Champy
17. Who Moved My Cheese – Spencer Johnson
18. Our Iceberg is Melting - John Kotter
19. Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron – Bethany McLean & Peter Elkind
20. Changing the Way We Change - Jeanenne LaMarsh
21. Leading Change - John Kotter
22. The Path of Least Resistance for Managers - Robert Fritz
23. Organization Development & Change (8th edition) - Cummings & Worly
24. Learning to Change. A Guide for Organization Change Agents - Caluwé L. de & H. Vermaak
25. Images of Organization - Gareth Morgan
Posted by: Jim Markowsky, X-Factor Solutions
Visit our web site at: http://www.x-factor-solutions.com
Friday, August 15, 2008
Selling Organizational Change as a "Project"
1.) Explain the “J Curve” effect (whenever you introduce change into an established system, things will get worse before they get better). Show how the drop in productivity can be diminished and how the timeframe of the drop can be shortened by an effective change management process (strong leadership vision and engagement, stakeholder management, effective communications, proper training, reinforcement strategies and appropriate business readiness action... all managed as a project, with a strategy and project plan). Executives like this approach as it makes good business sense for an investment in key resources to "get it right".
2.) In a 2003 survey of 327 companies in 53 countries, ProSci discovered that resistance to change within the organization was cited six times more often than any other as the number one obstacle to successful implementation of a project. Furthermore, when surveyed, and given the benefit of hindsight, the project teams picked more effective change management as the top activity that they would do differently on the next project.
3.) In 2001, the Hay Group, Inc. noted that: 70% of all change initiatives fall short of expectation, and "people issues" are cited as the primary hurdle. Executives rank people-related issues as the most important driver of successfully implementing and sustaining change.
4.) The National Bureau of Labor estimates that people are productive an average of 4.2 hours per day at work. However, during times of unmanaged change, productive hours decrease to 1.2 per day, or a 75% productivity loss.
5.) The following summarizes a survey taken by Organizational Dynamics on ODNet: Why Do ERP Implementations Fail?
- 42% Leadership
- 27% Organizational & Cultural Issues
- 23% People Issues
- 4% Technology Issues
- 4% Other
6.) Erik Spurgin, Learning Consultant proposes the following tactic: "Use an 'upward selling' approach. How did the executive get to where they are today? Why do they handle change so well? Ask them with as much sincere candor as you can muster. Allow them to talk about 'hard work', 'perserverence', et. al. for as long you can get them to talk. Listen, they will provide you with the information that you need in order to close the sale... in this case, the strategy and the funding for the strategy" .
Posted by: Jim Markowsky, X-Factor Solutions, http://www.x-factor-solutions.com